Observing a Sales Training Program…
I’m in Boston today and tomorrow observing a sales training program that is being delivered to one of ESR’s smaller clients. This is not something we typically do at ESR, but these circumstances are special: Our client is in the midst of a textbook-perfect deployment of a new sales methodology, training and the implementation of some powerful Sales 2.0 technology. I want to personally document this as we are planning to publish a case study three months down the road.
ESR had the opportunity to perform the needs analysis (we call it a Sales Effectiveness Audit). The CEO had engaged ESR, looking for a comprehensive and objective view of the sales capabilities of his 22-person team, and options for increasing their performance. Working closely with the VP of marketing and two regional VPs of sales, we transformed relevant components of that audit into an RFP.
ESR proposed a long list of vendors.  Those firms received the RFPs (after receiving a heads-up from me) and the client culled the list down after evaluating the responses. It’s important to mention that in the email I sent to the CEOs of the long-listed firms, I personally verified that each vendor had an equal opportunity to win, it was a real, funded opportunity and that no vendors had any input into the RFP or contact with anyone at our client’s company. That took some of the sting out of the RFP process, although one arrogant, well-known vendor did nothing more than copy and paste from their website into the RFP. So much for their approach to aligning their selling process with how their customers buy.
The short-listed vendors presented to members of a team consisting of the CEO, the two regional sales VPs, the marketing VP and ESR. A finalist was selected and contract negotiations completed.
Over the period of two months, the vendor customized their foundation selling methodology and sales enablement technology tools to align perfectly with the client’s customers’ buying processes. This was done in a way that engaged the client’s executive team and greatly facilitated executive buy-in, all the way up to the CEO.  We’ll cover other facets of this initiative in our case study and several upcoming ESR/Insight Briefs.
ESR watched the vendor’s consultant validate his findings with sales reps in the field, getting their buy-in as well. 
As you can see, this is not a tactical sales training event to fill some time at a sales kick-off meeting. In fact, the client originally wanted the training to take place during their kick-off in January, but the vendor, along with ESR strongly suggested that that wasn’t enough time for the process re-engineering work. The CEO relented. Smart move on his part.
The CEO kicked the training off this morning, recounting much of what I’ve covered above. He talked convincingly about how his company would support and fund the team’s effort to improve their capabilities over the next three years—that it was a long-term investment.
Then one of the regional sales VPs covered the selling challanges that they had been facing and specifically how the re-eingineered process, training and technology support would provide a new path to winning.
The program is going very well as I write this, five hours into it. The facilitator is clearly very familiar with the client, the team and the process. The sales reps (and VPs, who are taking the program) are pumped and already discussing how using their new approach and tools will change the game in the field. The balance among lecture, team, individual and pc-based learning is apparently working quite well.
If you’d like to discuss any aspect of this, let me know. You can call or write.
I’ll keep you posted. (See part 2.)
Filed under: Methodology, Sales Training Companies, Technology | Tagged: Methodology, training




You make all this sound so perfect. First, I question the vp’s of sales.. The ones I know don’t have time for all this. The pressure is on, especially in this economy.
Next, there are plenty of good sales trainers. Why put your client through all this?
Next, the RFP. I remember in your book that you advised sales reps not to respond to blind RFP’s. You had some very good reasons. Now, since you are writing them, you’ve changed your position? (I saw that someone else said this on your old blog).
I’d like to hear the story from your client, not that I don’t believe you.
Thanks for your comment. It was not my intention to suggest that this situation is perfect. This client has real challenges in the sales area, only some of which will be overcome through this methodology/training initiative.
So far as VPs having no time for something like this, not enough VPs are doing what they need to do to improve their team’s performance. There is plenty of research that supports my position. Is there something more important on which they should spend their time?
With respect to sales trainers, every sales training company we’ve looked at has happy, referenceable customers. But there too many training company customers that complain that the training company they last engaged with didn’t get the job done. Not a single training company is right for every situation.
On the RFP issue, you’re right. I do recommend not responding to blind RFPs. The reason is that if you didn’t write or influence the content of the RFP, your competitor probably did, and you, as a result, are probably going to lose. In this case though, a competitor didn’t write or influence the RFP. The RFP is pure, accurately representing the real needs of the client, and each competitor has an equal chance of winning.
You’ll get the story from the client’s perspective after we’ve been able to quantify the results of this intervention.
Hey Topsellah—
I’m one of the Sales VPs that Dave mentions. While I agree that we Sales VPs are unceasingly busy with earth-shattering demands on our time (hope my boss is reading this), I feel strongly that a lack of real and visible buy-in by sales leadership dooms an initiative like this to failure. And if it’s going to fail, why do it?We’re betting some big bucks - both cold hard cash and the time investment of the sales team - on this re-engineering of our selling efforts. Everybody, from RSMs all the way up to VPs, has to “live it and breath it” if it’s going to work. So, despite the pull of “gotta do it now” sales issues all week, we all carved out the time to live it and breath it. It was refreshing, engergizing, and productive. And I actually think that, during our deal reviews using the new methodology, we may have come up with some ideas that might win us a couple of incremental pieces of business. So while I hear your concern, please know that this process was well worth the entire team’s time - especially the time of leadership.